Applies to Alpha Brands services that host or otherwise make user-provided information available to users in the EU, to the extent the Digital Services Act applies.
DSA Article 13 representative unde este aplicabil: Peter Lukovits, Szent István krt. 15, 1055 Budapest, Hungary, lukovits@drlukovitsh.hu, +36 1 354 0841. The written mandate and required Digital Services Coordinator formalities trebuie să be completed.
A person or entity ar trebui să be able to submit a sufficiently precise, adequately substantiated electronic notice identifying specific allegedly illegal conținut. The mechanism ar trebui să be easy to access and, where Article 16 applies, not restricted to logged-in users.
Recommended fields: URL; Magic Code/Event ID; exact location; category; explanation; legal basis where known; reporter contact; relevant evidence; and a special option for “I am the person depicted or named on this page.”
A notice nu automatically prove illegality. Alpha Brands poate request more information, take no action, restrict visibility, remove hosted conținut, disable access, remove a preview, disable a Code/shortlink, suspend monetization or take cont action.
Where the underlying conținut is hosted by a third party, Alpha Brands can act on its own link/preview/Event/Code/monetization but poate not control removal from the third party.
Conținut Privat și Confidențial poate also be reported by an authorized recipient. Reporting nu make it public; internal access ar trebui să be limited to what is necessary.
Where Article 17 applies to a restriction, the affected user ar trebui să receive a sufficiently clear and specific statement of reasons, including the nature of the restriction, factual/legal or contractual basis, relevant automation information where required, and available redress.
Where Article 20 applies to the relevant online-platform service and no exemption applies, an electronic, free and accessible internal complaint mechanism trebuie să be offered for the statutory period, with appropriate human review rather than solely automated resolution.
Where applicable, users trebuie să be informed about certified out-of-court dispute settlement under Article 21 and retain access to judicial remedies.
Trusted-flagger notices and repeated manifestly unfounded notices or repeated manifestly illegal submissions ar trebui să be handled in accordance with the DSA obligations applicable to the relevant service.
The DSA classification of aplaud.me, applause.website and magic-code.net trebuie să be assessed based on their actual functionality. UGC/hosting functions on aplaud.me are likely to be the most legally significant. Micro/small-enterprise exemptions for some obligations trebuie să be verified rather than assumed.
Applicable transparency reporting, decision records and moderation logs ar trebui să be maintained according to the service classification and company size.
Until the in-product mechanism is implemented on every relevant surface, reports poate temporarily be sent to aplaud.me@gmail.com; this temporary email channel ar trebui să not replace the required accessible Report Content mechanism where Article 16 applies.